Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_22410 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_22410
Biomarker nameTreponema denticola
Biomarker TypeNA
Sampling MethodSixty-eight patients were included in this cross-sectional study. They were divided into two groups: 34 patients with at least one healthy implant (control) and 34 with at least one peri-implantitis affected implant (test).
Collection MethodThe PICF samples were collected from the same healthy and diseased implant sites that fulfill the inclusion criteria to establish a correlation between microbial profiles.
Analysis MethodqPCR
Collection SiteWhole Saliva
Disease CategoryHealthy
Disease/ConditionNA
Disease SubtypeNA
Fold Change/ Concentration0.17
Up/DownregulatedDownregulated
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID26424287
Year of Publication2015
Biomarker ID158
Biomarker CategoryMicrobe
SequenceNC_002967.9
Title of studyProtein biomarkers and microbial profiles in peri-implantitis
Abstract of studyOBJECTIVES: The aim of the present investigation was to determine the profile of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) biomarkers combined with microbial profiles from implants with healthy peri-implant tissues and peri-implantitis to assess real-time disease activity.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients were included in this cross-sectional study. They were divided into two groups: 34 patients with at least one healthy implant (control) and 34 with at least one peri-implantitis affected implant (test). Total DNA content and qPCR analysis for periodontal bacteria obtained from subgingival plaque samples (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola) and a PICF analysis for IL-1β, VEGF, MMP-8, TIMP-2, and OPG were performed. The individual and combined diagnostic ability of each biomarker for peri-implantitis and target bacterial species were analyzed.RESULTS: The mean concentration of IL-1β (44.6 vs. 135.8 pg/ml; P < 0.001), TIMP-2 (5488.3 vs. 9771.8 pg/ml; P = 0.001), VEGF (59.1 vs. 129.0 pg/ml; P = 0.012), and OPG (66.5 vs. 111.7 pg/ml; P = 0.050) was increased in the peri-implantitis patients. The mean expression of MMP-8 (6029.2 vs. 5943.1 pg/ml; P = 0.454) and did not reveal a meaningful difference among groups. Total bacterial DNA of selected microorganisms was associated with a threefold or greater increase in peri-implantitis although no statistical significant difference. The ability to diagnose diseased sites was enhanced by T. denticola combined with IL-1β, VEGF, and TIMP-2 PICF levels.CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that the increased levels of the selected PICF-derived biomarkers of periodontal tissue inflammation, matrix degradation/regulation, and alveolar bone turnover/resorption combined with site-specific microbial profiles may be associated with peri-implantitis and could have potential as predictors of peri-implant diseases.