Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_20206 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_20206
Biomarker namePrevotella nigrescens
Biomarker TypeNA
Sampling MethodNA
Collection MethodStudents were asked to chew a sugar-free gum for 2 min and expectorated into a sterile container. Samples were processed within 1 h to eliminate any enzymatic breakdown.
Analysis Method16S rRNA-based PCR
Collection SiteWhole Saliva
Disease CategoryHealthy
Disease/ConditionHealthy
Disease SubtypeNA
Fold Change/ ConcentrationNA
Up/DownregulatedNA
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID19162209
Year of Publication2009
Biomarker ID28133
Biomarker CategoryMicrobe
SequenceNZ_CP072342.1
Title of studySalivary detection of periodontopathic bacteria and periodontal health status in dental students
Abstract of studyOBJECTIVE: Saliva may become a potential source of contamination through vertical and horizontal transmissions as well as cross-infections. This study aims to use saliva as a screening tool to detect putative periodontal pathogens in a young population with fairly good oral hygiene.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stimulated saliva samples were obtained from 134 dental students (20.5+/-1 years, range 18-22 years). Among those, 77 subjects also completed a periodontal examination including attachment loss, modified dental, gingival and plaque indices (AL, mDI, GI and PI). The test bacteria were identified using a 16S rRNA-based PCR detection method.RESULTS: One or more of the test bacteria was found in 67% of the subjects. Prevotella nigrescens was detected as single bacterium in 16% of the subjects followed by Treponema denticola (4%), Porphyromonas gingivalis (2%), Aggregatibacter (formerly Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans (1%) and Tannerella forsythia (1%). Two or more pathogens were detected in 42% of the subjects. Clinical examination revealed health with no attachment loss (AL) in 84% of the students. In no AL group, 38% of the students were pathogen free while this was 25% for students in localized AL group (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant association between the detection of salivary periodontal pathogen in general and higher PI (p=0.018) and GI (p=0.043).CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, it is possible to detect all six periodontal pathogens in the saliva of dental students. Although a correlation can be observed between the presence of salivary periodontal pathogen and clinical signs of inflammation such as plaque accumulation and gingival bleeding, detection of specific bacteria in saliva is not related to the presence of localized AL based on the presented study population.