Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_16889 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_16889
Biomarker nameDiethanolamine
Biomarker TypeNA
Sampling MethodUnstimulated saliva samples were collected from 41 patients with LC and 21 with BLL.
Collection MethodApproximately 4-5 mL unstimulated whole saliva was collected from each participant over a 5- to 15-minute interval.
Analysis MethodCE-TOFMS
Collection SiteSaliva
Disease CategoryBenign Tumor
Disease/ConditionBenign Lung Lesion
Disease SubtypeNA
Fold Change/ ConcentrationNA
Up/DownregulatedNA
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID34918488
Year of Publication2022
Biomarker ID8113
Biomarker CategoryMetabolite
SequenceC(CO)NCCO
Title of studyDifferential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign lung lesion using salivary metabolites: A preliminary study
Abstract of studyBACKGROUND: Saliva is often used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of some oral and systematic diseases, owing to the non-invasive attribute of the fluid. In this study, we aimed to identify salivary biomarkers for distinguishing lung cancer (LC) from benign lung lesion (BLL).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 41 patients with LC and 21 with BLL. Salivary metabolites were comprehensively analyzed using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. To differentiate between patients with LCs and BLLs, the discriminatory ability of each biomarker was assessed. Furthermore, a multiple logistic regression (MLR) model was developed for evaluating discriminatory ability of each salivary metabolite.RESULTS: The profiles of 10 salivary metabolites were remarkably different between the LC and BLL samples. Among them, the concentration of salivary tryptophan was significantly lower in the samples from patients with LC than in those from patients with BLL, and the area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating patients with LC from those with BLL was 0.663 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.516-0.810, p = 0.036). Furthermore, from the MLR model developed using these metabolites, diethanolamine, cytosine, lysine, and tyrosine, were selected using the back-selection regression method. The MLR model based on these four metabolites had a high discriminatory ability for patients with LC and those with BLL (AUC = 0.729, 95% CI = 0.598-0.861, p = 0.003).CONCLUSION: The four salivary metabolites can serve as potential non-invasive biomarkers for distinguishing LC from BLL.