Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_16395 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_16395
Biomarker nameRibulose 5-phosphate
Biomarker TypeNA
Sampling MethodPatients with oral cancer and healthy controls were recruited at the Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Yamagata University Hospital from 2012 to 2014.
Collection MethodApproximately 400 microliter unstimulated whole saliva was collected over 5-10 min. After collection, the saliva samples were immediately stored at -80 degreeC.
Analysis MethodCE-TOFMS
Collection SiteWhole Saliva
Disease CategoryCancer
Disease/ConditionOral Cancer
Disease SubtypeOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)
Fold Change/ Concentration1.49
Up/DownregulatedIncrease
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID27539254
Year of Publication2016
Biomarker ID439184
Biomarker CategoryMetabolite
SequenceC([C@H]([C@H](C(=O)CO)O)O)OP(=O)(O)O
Title of studyIdentification of salivary metabolomic biomarkers for oral cancer screening
Abstract of studyThe objective of this study was to explore salivary metabolite biomarkers by profiling both saliva and tumor tissue samples for oral cancer screening. Paired tumor and control tissues were obtained from oral cancer patients and whole unstimulated saliva samples were collected from patients and healthy controls. The comprehensive metabolomic analysis for profiling hydrophilic metabolites was conducted using capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry. In total, 85 and 45 metabolites showed significant differences between tumor and matched control samples, and between salivary samples from oral cancer and controls, respectively (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 correlated by false discovery rate); 17 metabolites showed consistent differences in both saliva and tissue-based comparisons. Of these, a combination of only two biomarkers yielded a high area under receiver operating characteristic curves (0.827; 95% confidence interval, 0.726-0.928, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.0001) for discriminating oral cancers from controls. Various validation tests confirmed its high generalization ability. The demonstrated approach, integrating both saliva and tumor tissue metabolomics, helps eliminate pseudo-molecules that are coincidentally different between oral cancers and controls. These combined salivary metabolites could be the basis of a clinically feasible method of non-invasive oral cancer screening.