Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_15206 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_15206
Biomarker nameInterleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) (Catabolin)
Biomarker TypeNA
Sampling MethodNA
Collection MethodUnstimulated whole saliva was collected at each study visit via passive drooling into sterile plastic tubes from all participants (Mandel and Wotman, 1976).
Analysis MethodProtein biomarker levels were determined by colorimetric-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), fluorescence-based protein microarrays, and radioimmunoassay (RIA), run according to manufacturer protocols. ELISAs (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) were used for measurement of MMP-8 and -9, calprotectin, and osteoprotegerin (OPG). Detection of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-Î+-, and interferon (IFN)-γ
Collection SiteWhole Saliva
Disease CategoryDental Disorder
Disease/ConditionChronic periodontitis
Disease SubtypeNA
Fold Change/ ConcentrationNA
Up/DownregulatedNA
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID21406610
Year of Publication2011
Biomarker IDP01584
Biomarker CategoryProtein
SequenceMAEVPELASEMMAYYSGNEDDLFFEADGPKQMKCSFQDLDLCPLDGGIQLRISDHHYSKGFRQAASVVVAMDKLRKMLVPCPQTFQENDLSTFFPFIFEEEPIFFDTWDNEAYVHDAPVRSLNCTLRDSQQKSLVMSGPYELKALHLQGQDMEQQVVFSMSFVQGEESNDKIPVALGLKEKNLYLSCVLKDDKPTLQLESVDPKNYPKKKMEKRFVFNKIEINNKLEFESAQFPNWYISTSQAENMPVFLGGTKGGQDITDFTMQFVSS
Title of studySaliva/pathogen biomarker signatures and periodontal disease progression
Abstract of studyThe purpose of this study was to determine the role of saliva-derived biomarkers and periodontal pathogens during periodontal disease progression (PDP). One hundred human participants were recruited into a 12-month investigation. They were seen bi-monthly for saliva and clinical measures and bi-annually for subtraction radiography, serum and plaque biofilm assessments. Saliva and serum were analyzed with protein arrays for 14 pro-inflammatory and bone turnover markers, while qPCR was used for detection of biofilm. A hierarchical clustering algorithm was used to group study participants based on clinical, microbiological, salivary/serum biomarkers, and PDP. Eighty-three individuals completed the six-month monitoring phase, with 39 [corrected] exhibiting PDP, while 44 [corrected] demonstrated stability. Participants assembled into three clusters based on periodontal pathogens, serum and salivary biomarkers. Cluster 1 members displayed high salivary biomarkers and biofilm; 71% [corrected] of these individuals were undergoing PDP. Cluster 2 members displayed low biofilm and biomarker levels; 76% [corrected] of these individuals were stable. Cluster 3 members were not discriminated by PDP status; however, cluster stratification followed groups 1 and 2 based on thresholds of salivary biomarkers and biofilm pathogens. The association of cluster membership to PDP was highly significant (p < 0.0007). [corrected] The use of salivary and biofilm biomarkers offers potential for the identification of PDP or stability (ClinicalTrials.gov number, CT00277745).