Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_12018 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_12018
Biomarker nameMacrophage migration inhibitory factor
Biomarker TypePrognostic
Sampling MethodA total of 27 patients were included, of whom 21 (77.8%) had locally advanced disease (clinical stage III or IV). Most patients (70.4%) received CRT.
Collection MethodSaliva samples were aliquoted in 2-mL tubes and immediatelyfrozen at-80 degreeC for long-term storage
Analysis MethodSRM-MS
Collection SiteWhole Saliva
Disease CategoryCancer
Disease/ConditionHead and neck Cancer
Disease SubtypeHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Fold Change/ Concentration21.4
Up/DownregulatedUpregulated
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID33009579
Year of Publication2020
Biomarker IDP14174
Biomarker CategoryProtein
SequenceMPMFIVNTNVPRASVPDGFLSELTQQLAQATGKPPQYIAVHVVPDQLMAFGGSSEPCALCSLHSIGKIGGAQNRSYSKLLCGLLAERLRISPDRVYINYYDMNAANVGWNNSTFA
Title of studySalivary alpha-1-antitrypsin and macrophage migration inhibitory factor may be potential prognostic biomarkers for oncologic treatment-induced severe oral mucositis
Abstract of studyAIMS: Evaluate the abundance of the selected targets, alpha-1-antitrypsin (A1AT) and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), and correlate these findings with the risk of developing severe oral mucositis (OM).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients submitted to radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were assessed. OM grade and pain were evaluated daily during treatment. Two protein targets, A1AT and MIF, were evaluated, using selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (SRM-MS), in whole saliva, collected prior to oncologic treatment. The results obtained from the targeted proteomic analysis were correlated with OM clinical outcomes.RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were included, of whom 21 (77.8%) had locally advanced disease (clinical stage III or IV). Most patients (70.4%) received CRT. OM grades 2 (40.8%) and 3 (33.3%) were the most prevalent during RT with a mean highest reported OM-related pain of 3.22 through the visual analogue scale (VAS). The abundance of A1AT and MIF correlated significantly with severe (grades 3 or 4, pā€‰<ā€‰0.02) compared with moderate-low (grades 1 or 2, pā€‰<ā€‰0.04) OM grade.CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between the abundance of salivary A1AT and MIF and oncologic treatment-induced OM. The correlation of MIF expression with severe OM appears to be compatible with its physiological pro-inflammatory role. These results open up great possibilities for the use of salivary MIF and A1AT levels as prognostic markers for effective therapeutic interventions, such as photobiomodulation therapy, patient-controlled analgesia, or personalized medicaments.