Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_11911 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_11911
Biomarker namebeta-2 microglobulin
Biomarker TypeDiagnostic
Sampling MethodThis case-control study included 20 patients with PC (Prostate cancer) and 20 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Collection MethodGenerally, the time of specimen collection was 5 minutes; each participant donated 5 to 10 mL of saliva.
Analysis MethodELISA
Collection SiteSaliva
Disease CategoryCancer
Disease/ConditionProstate Cancer
Disease SubtypeNA
Fold Change/ ConcentrationNA
Up/DownregulatedUpregulated
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID32374392
Year of Publication2019
Biomarker IDP61769
Biomarker CategoryProtein
SequenceMSRSVALAVLALLSLSGLEAIQRTPKIQVYSRHPAENGKSNFLNCYVSGFHPSDIEVDLLKNGERIEKVEHSDLSFSKDWSFYLLYYTEFTPTEKDEYACRVNHVTLSQPKIVKWDRDM
Title of studySerum and Saliva Concentrations of Biochemical Parameters in Men with Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hyperplasia
Abstract of studyOBJECTIVES: To find suitable biomarkers for diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) in serum and saliva; also, to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of saliva in patients with PC.METHODS: This case-control study included 20 patients with PC and 20 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Blood and saliva were collected from the participants and centrifuged. Serum and supernatant saliva were used for biochemical analysis. We evaluated serum and salivary levels of urea, creatinine, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), creatine kinase BB (CK-BB), zinc, β-2 microglobulin (B2M), and melatonin. Also, we used Mann-Whitney U testing, Spearman correlation coefficients, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate the data.RESULTS: Serum and salivary concentrations of urea, creatinine, PSA, CK-BB, zinc, and B2M were significantly higher in patients with PC, compared with the BPH group (P <.05). However, serum and salivary concentrations of melatonin were significantly lower in patients with PC, compared with BPH group (P <.05). In both groups, salivary concentrations of all markers were lower (P <.05), compared with those values in serum. We observed positive correlation between serum and salivary concentrations of all markers studied (P <.05).CONCLUSION: From the data, we conclude that investigation using saliva specimens is a noninvasive, simple, and effective tool for screening of biochemical parameters.