Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_11879 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_11879
Biomarker nameAdenosine deaminase
Biomarker TypeDiagnostic
Sampling MethodA total of 152 patients with AD and controls were included.
Collection MethodSaliva samples were collected in the morning between 9 and 12 a.m. in a polypropylene tube, followed by centrifugation (3000g, 10 min, 4 degreeC) and storage of the supernatant at -80 degreeC until analysis.
Analysis MethodBiochemical analysis
Collection SiteWhole Saliva
Disease CategoryNeurological Disorder
Disease/ConditionAlzheimerÕs disease
Disease SubtypeNA
Fold Change/ ConcentrationNA
Up/DownregulatedUpregulated
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID31989369
Year of Publication2020
Biomarker IDQ6DHV7
Biomarker CategoryProtein
SequenceMIEAEEQQPCKTDFYSELPKVELHAHLNGSISSHTMKKLIAQKPDLKIHDQMTVIDKGKKRTLEECFQMFQTIHQLTSSPEDILMVTKDVIKEFADDGVKYLELRSTPRRENATGMTKKTYVESILEGIKQSKQENLDIDVRYLIAVDRRGGPLVAKETVKLAEEFFLSTEGTVLGLDLSGDPTVGQAKDFLEPLLEAKKAGLKLALHLSEIPNQKKETQILLDLLPDRIGHGTFLNSGEGGSLDLVDFVRQHRIPLELCLTSNVKSQTVPSYDQHHFGFWYSIAHPSVICTDDKGVFATHLSQEYQLAAETFNLTQSQVWDLSYESINYIFASDSTRSELRKKWNHLKPRVLHI
Title of studySalivary biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease
Abstract of studyOBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes that can occur in saliva components in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) of different severity and determine if any of these components could be a biomarker of this disease. Therefore, a panel of selected analytes related to the amyloid cascade, the immune and adrenergic systems, among others, were analyzed in the saliva of patients with Alzheimer's disease.METHODS: A total of 152 patients with AD and controls were included. The severity of the disease was established according to the Global Deterioration Scale. Unstimulated whole saliva was collected.RESULTS: Salivary amyloid-β42 was significantly lower, and complement C4 was significantly higher in the patients with AD than in the controls (p < 0.05 in both cases). Only complement C4 maintained its significant effect in the multivariate regression analysis. However, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of C4 was 0.613. No changes were found in any analyte regarding the severity of the disease.CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in amyloid-β42 and an increase in complement C4 were detected in the saliva of patients with AD, but the changes did not show a high diagnostic performance for the detection of AD and were not associated with its severity.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although some analytes showed significant differences in saliva in patients with AD, in our study conditions the salivary biomarkers analyzed were not of enough diagnostic utility for being used in routine.