Detailed description page of SalivaDB

This page displays user query in tabular form.

SAL_11737 details
Primary information
SALIDSAL_11737
Biomarker nameMMP3
Biomarker TypeDiagnostic
Sampling MethodSaliva samples collected from 30 healthy controls and 30 oral cancer patients
Collection MethodThe passive drooled saliva samples from the donors were collected using 15-ml sterile centrifuge tubes, and the obtained saliva samples were centrifuged at 3000 x g for 15 min at 4 degreeC
Analysis MethodAutomated and multiplexed SISCAPA assay + LC-MRM-MS analysis
Collection SiteSaliva
Disease CategoryCancer
Disease/Conditionoral Cancer
Disease SubtypeNA
Fold Change/ Concentration>1.5
Up/Downregulatedupregulated
ExosomalNA
OrganismHomo sapiens
PMID31689561
Year of Publication2020
Biomarker IDP08254
Biomarker CategoryProtein
SequenceMKSLPILLLLCVAVCSAYPLDGAARGEDTSMNLVQKYLENYYDLKKDVKQFVRRKDSGPVVKKIREMQKFLGLEVTGKLDSDTLEVMRKPRCGVPDVGHFRTFPGIPKWRKTHLTYRIVNYTPDLPKDAVDSAVEKALKVWEEVTPLTFSRLYEGEADIMISFAVREHGDFYPFDGPGNVLAHAYAPGPGINGDAHFDDDEQWTKDTTGTNLFLVAAHEIGHSLGLFHSANTEALMYPLYHSLTDLTRFRLSQDDINGIQSLYGPPPDSPETPLVPTEPVPPEPGTPANCDPALSFDAVSTLRGEILIFKDRHFWRKSLRKLEPELHLISSFWPSLPSGVDAAYEVTSKDLVFIFKGNQFWAIRGNEVRAGYPRGIHTLGFPPTVRKIDAAISDKEKNKTYFFVEDKYWRFDEKRNSMEPGFPKQIAEDFPGIDSKIDAVFEEFGFFYFFTGSSQLEFDPNAKKVTHTLKSNSWLNC
Title of studyAssessment of candidate biomarkers in paired saliva and plasma samples from oral cancer patients by targeted mass spectrometry
Abstract of studyFor oral cancer, numerous saliva- and plasma-derived protein biomarker candidates have been discovered and/or verified; however, it is unclear about the behavior of these candidates as saliva or plasma biomarkers. In this study, we developed two targeted assays, MRM and SISCAPA-MRM, to quantify 30 potential biomarkers in both plasma and saliva samples collected from 30 healthy controls and 30 oral cancer patients. Single point measurements were used for target quantification while response curves for assay metric determination. In comparison with MRM assay, SISCAPA-MRM effectively improved (>1.5 fold) the detection sensitivity of 11 and 21 targets in measurement of saliva and plasma samples, respectively. The integrated results revealed that the salivary levels of these 30 selected biomarkers weakly correlated (r < 0.2) to their plasma levels. Five candidate biomarkers (MMP1, PADI1, TNC, CSTA and MMP3) exhibited significant alterations and disease-discriminating powers (AUC = 0.914, 0.827, 0.813, 0.77, and 0.753) in saliva sample; nevertheless, no such targets could be found in plasma samples. Our data support the notion that saliva may be more suitable for the protein biomarker-based detection of oral cancer, and the newly developed SISCAPA-MRM assay could be applied to verify multiple oral cancer biomarker candidates in saliva samples. SIGNIFICANCE: In this work we systematically determined the abundance of 30 selected targets in the paired saliva and plasma samples to evaluate the utility of saliva and plasma samples for protein biomarker-based detection of oral cancer. Our study provides significant evidence to support the use of saliva, but not blood samples, offer more opportunity to achieve the success of protein biomarker discovery for oral cancer detection.