Algorithmic Details |
Here we describe the steps involved in the backend of BetaTPred3 prediction method. The main concept in this study is the use of turn level prediction rather than residue level prediction which is employed in previous methods. The turn level prediction approach has advantage to the residue based approach in the sense that the prediction is more realistic and the models developed are simple and not complex. |
|
|
|
|
Turn level Beta-turn prediction |
First, using input sequence we generate PSSM profile and predicted secondary structure using psipred inherent in HHSuite. Next, we generate pattern of four consecutive residues. If the pattern is making beta turn, we call it postive dataset otherwise we call it negative dataset. Next we combined the PSSM of four residues and predicted secondary strucutre to generate a window length of 92. With the inclusion of tetra-peptide propensity score, the final input vector becomes 93. In the end, we developed RandomForest model to predict beta turn in proteins. Figure 1 (given below) gives a graphical representation of the Turn level prediction approach of BetaTpred 3.0 |
Figure 1. Graphical representation of Turn level prediction approach of BetaTPred 3.0 |
Turn level Beta-turn Types prediction |
There are 9 subtypes of Beta-turns which are Type I, Type I', Type II, Type II', Type IV, Type VIa1, Type VIa2, Type VIb and Type VIII. The turn level approach is also applied in the prediction of Beta-turn Types. For each turn type, random forest based model is developed resulting in total of 9 models. Finally the turn type with probability greater than the respective thresholds is given as output. (Figure 2) |
Figure 2. Graphical representation of prediction of Betaturn Types using BetaTPred 3.0 |
Propensity based Beta-turn prediction |
In this approach, input sequence is splitted in overlapping windows of length 4. Different propensity scores of each window is calculated like Residue Position wise propensity (P1, P2, P3 and P4); Residue Pair wise propensity (P1-2, P1-3, P1-4, P2-3, P2-4, P3-4); Tri-peptide propensity (P1-2-3, P2-3-4); Tetra-peptide propensity (P1-2-3-4). The respective scores for each propensity based method is averaged. A threshold (T) is applied on the average score. If average score is above the threshold, the pattern is classified as Beta-turn, otherwise the pattern is classified as non-turn. Figure 3 (given below) displays the propensity based Betaturn prediction. |
Figure 3. Graphical representation of prediction of Betaturns based on different propensity based methods. |
Designing (inducing/breaking) Betaturns in a protein |
Protein Engineers are more interested in mutating some residue(s) in their protein of interest by which they can induce or break betaturn in the protein. In this module, the Propensity based approach is used to classify each pattern of the protein as Beta-turn or non-turn. In the next step, each pattern can be further mutated which will change its overall propensity towards formation of Betaturn. In this way, a user can identify specific pattern and mutation which can induce or break Beta-turns. |
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the working of Design module of BetaTPred 3.0 |