MycoBiomDB – Record Details (MyCo_4179)

Biomarker Record Details

Database ID: MyCo_4179
DB IDMyCo_4179
TitleMacrophage immunophenotypes in Jorge Lobo's disease and lepromatous leprosy- A comparative study
Year2024
PMID38484920
Fungal Diseases involvedJorge Lobo’s disease
Associated Medical ConditionLepromatous leprosy
GenusNone
SpeciesNone
OrganismNone
Ethical StatementThe Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective and analytical study before data gathering began.
Site of InfectionSkin
Opportunistic invasiveNone
Sample typeSkin swab
Sample sourceSkin swab
Host GroupHuman
Host Common nameHuman
Host Scientific nameHomo sapiens
Biomarker NameHAM 56
Biomarker Full NameHAM 56
Biomarker TypeDiagnostic
BiomoleculeProtein
Geographical LocationBrazil
CohortAll skin samples from patients with JLD from 2005 to 2017 were retrieved. Skin samples of 52 JLD patients and 16 LL patients were selected. There was a predominance of males (JLD =84.6%; LL = 87.5%); the mean age was 51 years in the JLD group and 51.25 in the LL group.
Cohort No.68
Age Group51-51.25
P Valuep=0.041
SensitivityNone
SpecificityNone
Positive Predictive ValueNone
MICNone
Fold ChangeNone
PathwayNone
Disease Introduction MechanismJorge Lobo’s disease (JLD) is a chronic cutaneous and subcutaneous fungal granulomatous disease first described in 1931. It is caused by Paracoccidioides lobogeorgii (formerly Lacazia loboi), an uncultivable fungal pathogen, and lepromatous leprosy (LL), a millenary disease caused by the Mycobacterium leprae complex bacteria, which is also uncultivable. They share several clinical, histological and immunopathogenic features. Both are prevalent diseases in the Brazilian Amazon. In JLD, typical skin lesions are nodular and keloidal, and in LL, they are indurated plaques and nodules (lepromas). In both diseases the ability to react to the etiological agent is spectral; many individuals from the same family, geographic region and occupations do not become infected, while others develop a more limited disease, and still others are more severely affected.
TechniqueImmunological assay
Analysis MethodImmunophenotypic profiles
ELISA kitsNone
Assay DataNone
Validation Techniques usedImmunophenotypic profiles
Up Regulation Down RegulationIncrease
Sequence DataNone
External LinkNone