MycoBiomDB – Record Details (MyCo_2591)

Biomarker Record Details

Database ID: MyCo_2591
DB IDMyCo_2591
TitleCombination of Mycological Criteria: a Better Surrogate to Identify COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis Patients and Evaluate Prognosis?
Year2022
PMID34985983
Fungal Diseases involvedPulmonary aspergillosis
Associated Medical ConditionCOVID-19 patients
GenusAspergillus
Speciesfumigatus
OrganismAspergillus fumigatus
Ethical StatementUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, UMR-2000, Paris, France institutional ethics committee approved the study (IDRCB, 2020-A00256-33; CPP, 11-20-20.02.04.68737). Written information was given to the patient or the next of kin.
Site of InfectionLungs
Opportunistic invasiveNone
Sample typeBody fluid
Sample sourceSerum
Host GroupHuman
Host Common nameHuman
Host Scientific nameHomo sapiens
Biomarker NameGM
Biomarker Full NameGalactomannan
Biomarker TypePrognostic
BiomoleculeProtein
Geographical LocationFrance
CohortA retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. All successive COVID-19 patients admitted to the four intensive care units (ICUs) of our two university hospitals between 15 March 2020 and 1 March 2021 with a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavi- rus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR test (Cobas SARS-CoV-2 test, Roche, Meylan, France) and $1 respiratory sample (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], tracheal aspirate, or sputum) sent to the mycology department were included. Of note, the 105 rst patients included were partially analyzed to assess risk factors associated with CAPA (12). Culture and Aspergillus quantitative PCR (qPCR) were systematically performed on all types of respiratory samples (BAL, sputum, tracheal, or bronchial aspirates).
Cohort No.176
Age Group58-72
P ValueNone
SensitivityNone
SpecificityNone
Positive Predictive ValueNone
MICNone
Fold ChangeNone
PathwayNone
Disease Introduction MechanismReports on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated aspergillosis (CAPA) are increasing but incidence, diagnosis, and management remains unclear. Because no host factor meeting European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycosis Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) de nitions is present in most patients, alternative classi cations were needed. Despite several attempts to clarify CAPA de nition by expert panels, diagnosis remains arguable. The lack of impact of both antifungal treatment and prophylaxis in many large cohort studies and the impact of prophylaxis on the incidence of CAPA cases lead to the hypothesis that many of these cases may only be colonization rather than infection.
TechniqueELISA
Analysis MethodELISA Based
ELISA kitsPlatelia™ Aspergillus Ag Kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA)
Assay DataFDA- Fungitell®, Cape Cod International, Inc.; Falmounth, MA, USA
Validation Techniques usedGM-Platelia™ Aspergillus Ag ELISA, GM lateral flow assay
Up Regulation Down RegulationPositive
Sequence DataNone
External LinkNone